Benoit Paire vs Daniil Glinka Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

When evaluating recent second serve performance, Paire has demonstrated an edge by winning 45.86% of points, surpassing Glinka's 43.57%. This metric is strongly linked to predicting match outcomes. Additionally, the ability to convert play during return games highlights Paire's success with a 48.03% win rate on opponent's second serve points, compared to Glinka's 42.55%. However, the competition is closer when returning first serves, with Paire leading slightly at 23.47% against Glinka's 22.88%.

Analyzing their ability to handle pressure, Glinka shines with a 53.53% break point save rate, overshadowing Paire's 46.67%. This proves useful for in-game betting scenarios where resilience is key. Examining their head-to-head performance over the past year reveals a stark contrast: Paire has struggled, winning only 28.13% of matches (W/L 9/23), while Glinka has outperformed with a 64.41% win rate (W/L 38/21).

Surface preferences further cement their differences, as Paire excels on clay with a 56% career win rate, while Glinka's peak performance appears on indoor hard courts, where he has maintained a 57% success rate. Both players struggle on opposite surfaces, as Paire has a lower win percentage on grass and Glinka on clay.

In terms of event participation and player level, Paire frequently competes in Challengers and ITF tournaments over $10K, achieving a modest 30.77% win rate (W/L 8/18). Meanwhile, Glinka finds more victories in Futures, Satellites, and ITF events around $10K, boasting a 69.39% win rate (W/L 34/15). This highlights a disparity in the quality of opponents, with Glinka facing players with an average rank of 162.05, edging out Paire's 222.38.

Their performance in deciding sets is also telling: over the last 12 months, Paire claimed victory in 20% of such scenarios, while Glinka excelled with 59%. The capacity to convert break points has given Paire a slight recent upper hand, achieving a conversion rate of 34.15%, closely followed by Glinka's 32.1%.

Based solely on these statistics and the comparative analysis, it appears Glinka holds the advantage and is more likely to secure a victory in this encounter.